| Customization: | Available |
|---|---|
| After-sales Service: | Online Support |
| Warranty: | 12 Months |
Suppliers with verified business licenses
Audited by an independent third-party inspection agency
| Technical Type | Working Principle | Advantages and Disadvantages | Application Scenarios |
| Multi-Effect Evaporation (MEE) | Utilizes the secondary steam generated by the previous-effect evaporator as the heat source for the next effect, connecting multiple evaporators (2-6 effects) in series to improve thermal energy utilization. | Low energy consumption (about 30-50 kg steam/ton water), moderate equipment investment; large floor space required, suitable for stable heat sources (e.g., power plant steam). | Large-scale leachate treatment (>100 tons/day) in scenarios with steam resources. |
| Mechanical Vapor Recompression (MVR) | Increases the temperature and pressure of secondary steam through a compressor, recycling it as a heat source with almost no external steam consumption. | Low energy consumption (about 80-120 kWh/ton water), small footprint, high automation; 30%-50% higher initial investment than MEE. | Medium-scale treatment (20-200 tons/day) in scenarios with sufficient power but no steam resources. |
| Falling Film Evaporation | Wastewater flows in a film-like manner along the inner wall of heating tubes, evaporated by external heating, featuring high heat transfer efficiency. | High heat transfer coefficient (about 1,500-3,000 W/M2·K), low energy consumption; prone to scaling, requiring regular cleaning. | Leachate with fewer suspended solids or used as a pretreatment unit. |
| Plate Evaporation | Employs plate heat exchangers as evaporation elements, with high heat transfer efficiency and compact structure. | Small footprint, easy to clean; high corrosion resistance required, suitable for low-salinity wastewater. | Pretreatment or small-scale devices. |